TRANSLATORS’ EXPLANATORY NOTE

The English content of this report is a free translation of the registered auditor’s report of the below-mentioned Polish Company. In Poland statutory accounts as well as the auditor’s report should be prepared and presented in Polish and in accordance with Polish legislation and the accounting principles and practices generally adopted in Poland.

The accompanying translation has not been reclassified or adjusted in any way to conform to the accounting principles generally accepted in countries other than Poland, but certain terminology current in Anglo-Saxon countries has been adopted to the extent practicable. In the event of any discrepancies in interpreting the terminology, the Polish language version is binding.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Polska spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Audyt sp. k. , ul. Polna 11, 00-633 Warsaw, Poland, T: +48 (22) 746 4000, F:+48 (22) 742 4040 ,

www.pwc.pl

PricewaterhouseCoopers Polska spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Audyt sp. k. is entered into the National Court Register maintained by the District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw, under KRS number 0000741448, NIP 113-23-99-979. The seat of the Company is in Warsaw at Polna 11.

Independent Registered Auditor’s Report

To the General Shareholders’ Meeting and the Supervisory Board of X-Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A.

Report on the audit of consolidated financial statements

Our opinion

In our opinion, the attached annual consolidated financial statements of X-Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A. Group („the Group”), in which X- Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A. is the parent entity (“the Parent Company”):

● give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2020 and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the applicable International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and the adopted accounting policies;

● comply in terms of form and content with the laws applicable to the Group and the Parent Company’s Articles of Association;

Our opinion is consistent with our additional report to the Audit Committee issued on the date of this report.

What we have audited

We have audited the annual consolidated financial statements of X-Trade Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A. Group which comprise:

● the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2020;

and the following prepared for the financial year from 1 January to 31 December 2020:

● the consolidated statement of comprehensive income;

● the consolidated statement of changes in equity;

● the consolidated statement of cash flows, and

● the notes comprising a description of the adopted accounting policies and other explanations.

2

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing as adopted as National Standards on Auditing by the National Council of Statutory Auditors ( “NSA”) and pursuant to the Act of 11 May 2017 on Registered Auditors, Registered Audit Companies and Public Oversight (“the Act on Registered Auditors” – Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1421, as amended) and Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014 of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding the statutory audit of public-interest entities (“the EU Regulation” – Journal of Laws EU L158). Our responsibilities under those NSA are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements section of our report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Federation of Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (“the IFAC Code”) as adopted by resolutions of the National Council of Statutory Auditors and other ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in Poland. We have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IFAC’s Code. During the audit, the key registered auditor and the registered audit firm remained independent of the Group in accordance with the independence requirements set out in the Act on Registered Auditors and in the EU Regulation.

Our audit approach

Overview

● The overall materiality threshold adopted for the purposes of our audit was set at PLN 24.900 thousand, which represents 5% of the profit before tax.

● We have audited the annual consolidated financial statement of the Group for the period ended 31 December 2020.

● The scope of our audit covered 100% of the sum of total assets of all the consolidated Group companies before consolidation eliminations.

● Valuation of financial assets and liabilities and recognition of result on operations on financial instruments

Materiality

Group scoping

Key audit matters

3

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements. In particular, we considered where the Company’s Parent Company’s Management Board made subjective judgements; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters, consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.

We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the Group operated.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by the adopted materiality level. Our audit was designed to obtain reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error.

They are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole, as presented below. These thresholds, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the consolidated financial statements as a whole.

Overall Group materiality

PLN 24.900 thousand (3.250 thousand PLN in 2019)

How we determined it

5% of profit before tax

Rationale for the materiality benchmark applied

We have taken profit before tax as the basis for determining materiality because we believe this measure is commonly used to evaluate the Company's operations by users of financial statements and is a generally accepted benchmark.

We applied materiality at 5% because, based on our professional judgment, it is consistent with the level of quantitative materiality used in the examination of profit-oriented entities in the brokerage industry.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above PLN 1.245 thousand, as

well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. They include the most significant identified risks of material misstatements, including the identified risks of material misstatement resulting from fraud. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit

of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon. We summarized our response to these risks and, when deemed appropriate, presented the most important observations relating to these risks. We do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

4

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Valuation of financial assets and liabilities and recognition of result on operations on financial instruments

The result on operations on financial instruments for the year ended December 31, 2020 amounted to PLN 792 788 thousand and constituted the most important item in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income of the Group. The value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities held for trading as at December 31, 2020 amounted to PLN 663 133 thousand and PLN 96 632 thousand respectively.

The result on operations on financial instruments of the Company consists of realized and unrealized gains or losses and costs related to trading in financial instruments.

The process of transacting with clients and performing valuations of derivative financial instruments is massive and involves large amounts of market data necessary for valuation.

Given the above, this area requires significant effort and expertise in financial instruments and the use of information systems, which is why we have identified it as a key research matter.

Information on accounting policies, as well as quantitative disclosures regarding the result on operations on financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities held for trading are described in notes 4.13, 4.4, 5.1, 15 and 21 respectively

As part of our audit procedures, we obtained an understanding of the Company's policies and procedures for entering into transactions and valuing financial instruments and recognizing the result thereof.

We analysed the design and verified the effectiveness of the control mechanisms implemented by the Company in this area, including the process of concluding transactions with customers, the valuation process, as well as the risk management process, including limits on open positions.

With respect to the IT systems by means of which transactions are concluded and financial instruments are valued, we obtained knowledge of the internal control mechanisms covering the area of change management and access control to the systems processing data on customer transactions.

On selected populations of transactions, we performed independent valuation of financial instruments and analysis of correctness of recognition of valuation in the books as at the balance sheet date. Furthermore, with regard to the result on financial instruments, we performed detailed tests, including independent recalculation of the result on a sample basis, as well as reconciliation of selected transactions to source documentation and testing of system reports. In addition, we conducted an analysis of customer complaints and claims.

Furthermore, we assessed the adequacy and completeness of the disclosures concerning the result on financial instruments, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities held for trading in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting standards applicable to the Company.

Responsibility of the Management and Supervisory Board for the consolidated financial statements

The Management Board of the Parent Company is responsible for the preparation of annual consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position and results of operations, in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as

adopted by the European Union, the adopted accounting policies, the applicable laws and the Parent Company’s Articles of Association, and for such internal control as the Management Board determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free

5

from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Parent Company’s Management Board is responsible for assessing the Company’s Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Management Board either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.

The Parent Company’s Management Board and members of its Supervisory Board are obliged to ensure that the consolidated financial statements comply with the requirements specified in the Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (“the Accounting Act” – Consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2021, item 217, as amended). Members of the Supervisory Board are responsible for overseeing the financial reporting process.

Auditor’s responsibility for the audit of the consolidated financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with the NSA will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.

The scope of the audit does not cover an assurance on the Group’s future profitability or the efficiency and effectiveness of the Parent Company’s Management Board conducting its affairs, now or in future.

As part of an audit in accordance with the NSA, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:

● Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

● Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.

● Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Parent Company’s Management Board.

● Conclude on the appropriateness of the Parent Company’s Management Board’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.

● Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.

● Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We communicate with the Audit Committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit

6

findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated to the Audit Committee, we determine those matters that were

of most significance in the audit of the {consolidated} financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Other information, including the Report on the operations

Other information

Other information comprises a Report on the Group’s and Company’s operations for the financial year ended 31 December 2020 (“the Report on the operations”) which is a separate part of the Report on the operations (together “Other Information”). Other information does not include the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon.

Responsibility of the Management and Supervisory Board

The Management Board of the Parent Company is responsible for preparing Other Information in accordance with the law.

The Parent Company’s Management Board and the members of the Supervisory Board are obliged to ensure that the Report on the operations including its separate parts complies with the requirements of the Accounting Act.

Registered auditor’s responsibility

Our opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements does not cover Other Information.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read Other Information and, in doing so, consider whether it is materially inconsistent with the information in the consolidated financial statements, our knowledge obtained in our audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we identified a material misstatement in Other Information, we are obliged to inform about it in our audit report. In accordance with the requirements of the Act on the Registered Auditors, we are also obliged to issue an opinion on whether the Report on the operations has been prepared in accordance with the law and is consistent with information included in annual consolidated financial statements.

Moreover, we are obliged to issue an opinion on whether the Parent Company provided the required information in its corporate governance statement.

Opinion on the Report on the operations

Based on the work we carried out during the audit, in our opinion, the Report on the Group’s operations:

● has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article 49 of the Accounting Act and para. 71 of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance dated 29 March 2018 on current and periodical information submitted by issuers of securities and conditions for considering as equivalent the information required under the legislation of a non-Member State (“Regulation on current information” – Journal of Laws 2018, item 757);

● is consistent with the information in the consolidated financial statements.

Moreover, based on the knowledge of the Group and its environment obtained during our audit, we have not identified any material misstatements in the Report on the Company’s Group’s operations.

Opinion on the corporate governance statement

In our opinion, in its corporate governance statement, the Group included information set out in para. 70.6 (5) of the Regulation on current information. In addition, in our opinion, information specified in paragraph 70.6 (5)(c)–(f), (h) and (i) of the said Regulation included in the corporate governance statement are consistent with the applicable provisions of the law and with information included in the consolidated financial statements.

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements

7

Report on the compliance of the format of the consolidated financial statements with the requirements of the European Single Electronic Format ("ESEF")

We have been engaged by the Board of Directors of the Parent Company under the audit contract for the consolidated financial statements to perform an attestation service that provides reasonable assurance regarding the verification of compliance with the applicable requirements of the electronic reporting format for the consolidated financial statements of the Group for the year ended December 31, 2020. ("Electronic Reporting Format for Consolidated Financial Statements").

Description of the subject matter of the contract and applicable criteria

The Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements has been applied by the Parent Company's Management Board to comply with the requirements of Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/815 of 17 December 2018 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards regulatory technical standards for the specification of a uniform electronic reporting format ("ESEF Regulation"). The applicable requirements for the Electronic Reporting Format for consolidated financial statements are contained in the ESEF Regulation.

The requirements described in the preceding sentence set out the basis for the use of the Electronic Reporting Format for Consolidated Financial Statements and, in our opinion, are appropriate criteria for making a conclusion that provides reasonable assurance.

We have been engaged by the Board of Directors of the Parent Company to issue a report on the compliance of the consolidated financial statement format with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation. This report is intended to be issued together with the consolidated financial statements of the Group.

Responsibility of the Management Board of the Parent Company and the Supervisory Board

Management of the Parent Company is responsible for using an Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements that complies with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation. This responsibility includes selecting and applying appropriate iXBRL designations using the ESEF taxonomy and designing, implementing and maintaining a system of internal controls adequate to produce an Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial

statements that does not contain material non- compliance with the requirements of the ESEF Regulation.

The members of the Board are responsible for overseeing the financial reporting process.

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility was to express a conclusion that provides reasonable assurance that the Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements complies, in all material respects, with the ESEF Regulation.

We performed our service in accordance with the National Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) "Assurance Engagements other than Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information" as read with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) issued by the National Council of Statutory Auditors (NSAE 3000 (Z)). This standard requires us to comply with ethical requirements, plan and perform procedures to obtain reasonable assurance that the Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements has been applied, in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable requirements.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but does not guarantee that a service performed in accordance with NSAE 3000 (Z) will always detect an existing material misstatement.

Summary of work done

The procedures we planned and performed were designed to provide reasonable assurance about whether the Electronic Reporting Format for the Consolidated Financial Statements has been applied, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable requirements and is free of material errors or omissions. Our procedures and consisted primarily of:

● Understand the internal controls and processes specific to the use of the Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements, including the use of XHTML format and labeling of the consolidated financial statements;

● Verification of the correct application of XHTML format;

● obtaining sufficient and appropriate evidence of the effectiveness of adequate controls over the labeling process when the assessment of the risk of material misstatement includes an expectation that such internal controls are operating

8

effectively or procedures other than testing of controls cannot themselves provide sufficient and appropriate evidence;

● an assessment of the completeness of the labeling of the consolidated financial statements using iXBRL tags in accordance with the electronic format implementation requirements described in the ESEF Regulation;

● An assessment of the appropriateness of the Group's use of XBRL tags selected from the ESEF taxonomy and the creation of extension tags where no relevant element has been identified in the ESEF taxonomy;

● An assessment of the appropriateness of anchoring the used taxonomy extensions to the core taxonomy defined in the ESEF Regulation.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to form the basis of our conclusion.

Conclusion

In our opinion, based on the procedures performed, the Electronic Reporting Format for the consolidated financial statements complies, in all material respects, with the ESEF Regulation.

Information on compliance with prudential regulations

The Management Board of the Parent Company is responsible for complying with the applicable prudential regulations set out in separate legislation, and in particular, for the correct determination of the capital ratios.

The capital ratios as at 31 December 2020 have been presented in Note 36 of the consolidated financial statements and include core Tier 1 capital ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital requirement.

We are obliged to give information in our report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements as to whether the Parent Company has complied with the applicable prudential regulations set out in separate legislation, and in particular, whether the Brokerage House has correctly determined its capital ratios. For the purposes of the said information, the following legal acts are understood as separate legislation: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, as amended (“CRR”), the Act of 5 August 2015 on

macro-prudential supervision over the financial system and on crisis management in the financial system (“the Act on macro-prudential supervision” – Journal of Laws of 2021, item 140), Regulation of the Minister of Development and Finance of 25 April 2017 on the internal capital, risk management system, supervisory evaluation program and supervisory review and evaluation process, and remuneration policy in a brokerage house; Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 1 July 2016 on the types of brokerage house exposures excluded from large exposure limits, and Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 27 June 2016 on the treatment by brokerage houses of large blocks of shares of non-financial sector entities referred to in Article 89(3) of Regulation 575/2013.

It is not the purpose of an audit of the financial statements to present an opinion on compliance with the applicable prudential regulations specified in the separate legislation specified above, and in particular, on the correct determination of the capital ratios, and therefore, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on the work performed by us, we inform you that we have not identified:

● any cases of non-compliance by the Parent Company with the applicable prudential regulations set out in the separate legislation referred to above, in the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020;

● any irregularities in the determination by the Parent Company of the capital ratios as at 31 December 2020 in accordance with separate legislation referred to above,

which would have a material impact on the financial statements.

Statement on the provision of non-audit services

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that the non-audit services we have provided to the Parent Company and its subsidiaries are in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable in Poland and that we have not provided any non-audit services prohibited under Article 5(1) of the EU regulation and Article 136 of the Act on Registered Auditors.

The non-audit services which we have provided to the Parent Company and its subsidiaries in the audited period are disclosed in the note 30 to the consolidated financial statements.

9

Appointment

We have been appointed to audit the annual financial statements of the Company for the next

two years by Resolution of the Supervisory Board 45/2018 of 7 November 2018. We have audited the Company's financial statements continuously beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, for a period of two years.

The Key Registered Auditor responsible for the audit on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers Polska spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Audyt sp.k., a company entered on the list of Registered Audit Companies with the number 144., is Agnieszka Accordi.

Agnieszka Accordi

Key Registered Auditor

No. 11665

Warsaw, 9 March 2021