XTB S.A. Group
Annual report for 2022
(Translation of a document originally issued in Polish)
www.xtb.com 146
Before the District Court in Warsaw, from 12 April 2017, proceedings were pending due to the Company's action to
prohibit XTRADE Europe Ltd. from violating the principles of fair competition, consisting in the unlawful use by the
defendant as a company designation or as financial services, brokerage and consulting services. financial, brokerage
and brokerage services, word and word and graphic markings "XTB", "X-Trade", "XTrade" and "X".
On July 12, 2019, the District Court in Warsaw, in a case against Xtrade Europe Ltd., issued a judgment in which:
(i) ordered the defendant XTRADE EUROPE LTD to refrain from acts of unfair competition against the plaintiff X-TRADE
Brokers Dom Maklerski S.A. in Warsaw, consisting in the unlawful use by the defendant as a company designation or of
financial services rendered, financial intermediation and consultancy, brokerage and brokerage services, including
services provided via the Internet, using specialized computer software, as well as training services, including in
materials advertising and in the name of the Internet domain xtrade.com, as well as on the websites available at:
www.xtrade.eu and xtrade.com, the following markings in the territory of the Republic of Poland: (a) the word markings
"XTB", "X-Trade", "XTrade", "Xtrade"; (b) the symbols xtrade.eu and xtrade.com; (ii) ordered the defendant XTRADE
EUROPE LTD to submit and publish, at his own expense and with his own effort, within 2 (two) months from the
announcement of the final judgment in the case and after changing the name of the defendant's company pursuant to
paragraph 1 of the final judgment, the statement on the decision referred to in the judgment content in the following
media: a) "Gazeta Giełdy i Inwestorów Parkiet"; b) on the defendant's website - on the home page; c) on websites
identified by domains: http://www.parkiet.com/, http: // www .gazetaprawna.pl / and http://rp.pl (iii) in the event that
before the publication of the statement there was a change of the defendant company, the defendant in the content of
the statement in place of the words "XTRADE EUROPE LTD" is obliged to use the name of the company current as of the
date of publication statements; and (iv) authorized the plaintiff to publish the statement at the defendant's expense in
the event of the defendant's failure to comply with the obligation to publish the statement on the content and within
the time limits specified in paragraph 2 of the judgment, and obliged the defendant to reimburse the costs incurred by
the plaintiff.
On 5 January 2022 the Court of Appeal ruled on the Company's appeal against the judgment of the Court of First
Instance. The appeal was upheld for the most part: the Court amended the judgment of the Court of First Instance and
prohibited XTRADE Europe from using a further 3 word and graphic signs, as claimed in the lawsuit. The appeal
regarding the claim for publishing an apology in the media was dismissed. The proceeding is legally closed.
In addition, the Munich Regional Court, in a judgment of 25 July 2017, issued a ban on the use of the designations
"XTRADE" and "XTRADE EUROPE Ltd." in Germany, confirming that the designations are confusingly similar to the
trademarks reserved by the Company. In addition, Xtrade Europe Ltd. was also required to provide information on the
extent and number of past use of the marks and to pay damages, the amount of which has not yet been determined.
On April 19, 2018, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of the Cypriot company - the verdict prohibiting the use of
the XTRADE sign in Germany is final. As at the date of submitting this report, proceedings are still pending to order
XTRADE Europe Ltd. to pay the costs of legal representation and to enforce a final judgment. Proceedings enforcing the
ruling ban were pending before European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) as regards the annulment of
conflicting marks of Xtrade Europe Ltd. On March 20, 2020, EUIPO issued a decision rejecting the application for
a declaration of invalidity. On 19 May 2020, an appeal was filed with the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. Currently we are
waiting for the decision of the authority. On 8 November 2021 the EUIPO Board of Appeal issued its decision and upheld
the arguments and evidence submitted by the Company and found that the Company's sign was used in Germany in
the course of trade of more than local significance prior to the date of application for the disputed mark and that the
Company's sign was used for "brokerage and financial services". For the rest, the Board of Appeal remitted the case
back to the first instance, the Cancellation Division, which will re-examine the application in question. In its re-
examination, the Cancellation Division will be bound by the arguments and reasoning of the Board of Appeal. In
addition, the Cancellation Division should analyse whether the other grounds for invalidity of the contested mark which
were not analysed by the Board of Appeal in its decision are fulfilled. Only after this analysis and reconsideration will
the Cancellation Division issue a decision on the merits of the application and the cancellation. This decision will again
be subject to appeal by either party. The proceeding before EUIPO is pending.
XTRADE EUROPE Ltd., currently under the name of Guma Holding Ltd., filed a complaint with the General Court of the
European Union against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of November 8, 2021, in which it applied for
the amendment of this decision in its entirety by dismissing the application for annulment. The company responded to
the complaint on May 26, 2022. Guma Holding Ltd. applied to the General Court of the European Union for a hearing.
On January 26, 2023, a hearing was held before the European Union Court in the case and the Company is awaiting a
ruling.