The Company’s Management and members of the Supervisory Board are required to
ensure that the separate financial statements meets the requirements of the Accounting
Act. The members of the Supervisory Board are responsible for overseeing the
Company's financial reporting process.
Auditor’s responsibility for audit of the separate financial statement
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the separate financial
statement s as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with NAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these separate financial statement.
The scope of the audit does not include assurance as to the future profitability of the
Company nor effectiveness of conducting business matters now and in the future by
the Company’s Management.
As part of an audit in accordance with NAS, we exercise professional judgment and
maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit and we also:
•
identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the separate financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit
procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations or override of internal control,
•
obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control,
•
evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the
Company’s Management,
•
conclude on the appropriateness of the Company’s Management’s use of the
going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained,
whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may
cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our independent auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the
separate financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify
our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to